🔗 Share this article

Ten years after the UK stumbled into a rushed public vote that polarised the nation and unleashed turmoil, a caution emerges from beyond the Irish Sea: it may occur once more.

Authorities and citizens drifted into Brexit and the identical may happen with a national vote on a unified Ireland, initiating convulsions for which nobody is equipped.

That represents the warning from two respected journalists from both sides of the Irish border who have teamed up to analyse the benefits and drawbacks of Northern Ireland exiting the UK to establish a different country with the Republic of Ireland.

Administrative Establishments Unprepared

Fintan O’Toole and Sam McBride, have determined that the government bodies in Ireland and Britain are extremely unready for a potentially tense and seismic public vote.

"The key takeaway of Brexit hasn't been learned, which is that developments can come out of the blue and can gain traction very quickly," O’Toole said. "In my opinion that the political architecture of our islands remains highly fragile."

New Title Seeks to Encourage Dialogue

The duo have studied the political, financial and societal reasons for any structural alteration in a book, Examining Irish Unification, released by the Dublin-based Royal Irish Academy.

They seek to encourage dialogue on the topic with a series of lectures that will take them to Westminster soon.

"What troubles everybody, or should haunt every person, is the Brexit vote of 2016," commented the analyst.

"We do not want a referendum on a thumbs up-thumbs down, unclear proposal whose consequences have not been spelled out because then you end up with an extraordinarily polarised community where people who have lost are not reconciled to defeat and the people who have won don't know precisely what it is that they have gained."

Legal Framework

Under the Good Friday agreement, the Northern Ireland official is obliged to schedule a public vote on Irish unification if it seems probable that a majority would approve.

Nationalist parties and other nationalists argue that moment is imminent, and a non-profit called Ireland’s Future has built momentum, but authorities in Dublin and London and unionists minimise the likelihood, resulting in ambiguity when or if there will be a national vote.

Insufficient Serious Debate

Political rhetoric for and against unity has hidden the absence of substantive discussion, said McBride.

"Individuals are often for or against the idea but the concrete planning which may surpass that to make it possible hasn't for the most part happened. Much has taken place in scholarly circles but very few politicians or activists seek to involve themselves with even the fundamentals. As an example, what type of nation might be preferred? Unitary? Decentralised?"

Publication's Method

In the book, neither author supports unification or the existing arrangement. They writes two articles that strive for objectivity in presenting the argument for a united Ireland and the argument opposing it, assembling financial and societal figures, historical precedents and governmental frameworks.

Arguments range over flags and symbols, duties, medical care, pensions, national debt responsibilities and the threat of pro-UK militancy. The objective is to inform and stimulate conversation.

"There is significant curiosity in the issue but there hasn't quite been a dialogue," commented O’Toole. "Debate indicates an acknowledgement of the concept that there could be good arguments on both sides."

Dual Referendums

A public vote in Northern Ireland would additionally cause one in the Republic of Ireland, where citizens report they prefer unity but oppose paying higher taxes or adopting a new flag to recognise pro-UK communities' UK heritage.

"Authorities in Dublin should determine what the plan from pro-unification movements is other than just declaring: 'We want a united Ireland and we value you'," said the commentator.

Probability of Referendum

The journalist believes a national vote in his era is possible and that it could happen abruptly. "You could have just a reckless or a bad or a feckless official who declares: 'Let's just do this and resolve it.'"

Both nationalists and pro-UK supporters have plausible, valid points, he commented. "Somebody will win on this issue and somebody will eventually lose but all factions has has valuable insights to gain from the opposing arguments."

Appeal for More Extensive Debate

Westminster should join the discussion, said O’Toole. "This involves your state. It's a British issue equally as it is an Irish matter."